efs 35mm macro vs 60mm macro

rev 2020.11.30.38081, The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Photography Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us. Tested with Nikon D7000 or Canon 7D. I have a Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro. site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. Macro - extension tubes vs reversal - how to choose? Why is SQL Server's STDistance Very Slightly Different Than The Vincenty Formula? The Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM is a dedicated macro lens. More distortion will result in straight lines being recorded incorrectly in the image. Also, vignetting usually isn't noticeable unless you're shooting a plain white de-focused wall wide open. At the shorter end of the lens you get the widest angle of view. The 35 mm lens includes two major features—image stabilization and an integrated ring light—that the 60 mm does not. I'm not looking at it as a macro lens as much as I'm looking at it as a fast, wide angle prime. This allows you to fit more of the scene into the photograph (based on APS-C format). Similarly, a 60mm Nikon lens is cheaper than the 105mm Micro Nikkor lens. 35.71% wider aperture at minimum focal length? Compare Canon EF-S 35mm f 2.8 Macro IS STM Lens vs Canon EF-S 60mm f 2.8 Macro USM Lens vs Venus Optics Laowa 60mm f 2.8 2X Ultra-Macro Lens for Canon EF vs Tamron SP 60mm f 2 Di II 1:1 Macro Lens for Canon EF A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths. Why is Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro better than Canon EF-S 60mm F/2.8 Macro USM? For these types of shoots, I use my three prime lenses: a 35mm f/1.4 G, an 85mm f/1.8G, and a 105mm f/2.8 macro. Here's other characteristics to consider : background blur, perspective reproduction, image stabilisation, (video usage ?). Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect the vibrations of the camera. The EF 35mm f/2 IS USM costs about 50% more than this EF-S lens. Optics. My question was more like: "here are the things I know will be different, but what are the things I haven't accounted for?" The sharpness result from the DxOMark set of metrics. Before then, I’d been using the 14-42mm kit lens for all my macro photography, which was sufficient for casual use but not enough to capture minute details. Source: DxOMark. This result is based on the MTF (modulation transfer function) measurement, and gives an overall indication of the sharpness of images produced by the lens. What would an agrarian society need with bio-circuitry? This is important as less light reaching the sensor can lead to the requirement of higher ISOs or slower shutter speeds. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. How does the title "Revenge of the Sith" suit the plot? Thanks! See full specification . The distortion result from the DxOMark set of metrics. Something that is not as readily apparent is the loss of light at high magnification values. How can I decide which lens to prioritize between Tokina 11-16 or Canon 15-85? A smaller aperture reduces the amount of light reaching the sensor. A macro lens is used to take very close-up photos, allowing you to capture flowers, insects etc. DxOMark is a set of tests to measure the performance and quality of lenses and cameras. and .. using ls or find? (Source: Canon.) If you're open to manual focus, there are some very good, sharp, inexpensive 35/2.8 lenses that might do what you need when thrown on a focusing helicoid. The zoom range is the ratio between the longest and shortest focal lengths. (Same Up To ~0.0001km), Removing an experience because of a company's fraud, Do it while you can or “Strike while the iron is hot” in French. When I do a wedding that only requires a few hours coverage, I also don’t bring my entire arsenal. Tested with Nikon D7000 or Canon 7D. Designed for APS-C DSLR cameras, the built-in Macro Lite gives you flexibility to use only half the light, the full light and more to help you achieve your desired effect. The DxOMark score is the overall score given to the lens. Seems like you've pretty much decided on the 35mm. Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange! Many lenses allow you to focus to infinity. The distance between the front element and this inner group, as well its distance to the sensor plane, determines how large the original projection of the front element will be when it arrives a… Obviously, the different focal lengths come with different perspective, DoF, etc. The EF-S designator could be considered a weakness by some, if one has designs on "upgrading" to a full frame body later, but it's a terrific lens and a great option for macro or portrait shooting. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject. They're both on the affordable end of the price range, both feature f/2.8 as maximum aperature, and both offer 1:1 magnification, so I'm trying to figure out what differentiates the two that I can make a decision based on. Lenses with a built-in focus motor can autofocus even if the camera does not have its own focus motor. Tested with Nikon D7000 or Canon 7D. When hiking, is it harmful that I wear more layers of clothes and drink more water? Best way to let people know you aren't dead, just taking pictures? If I can expect to get the same quality close-up shots from either lens, given my specific circumstances, I'd probably choose the 35 mm lens, since the side benefit is that now I have a fast 35 mm prime lens for non-macro use. Fuji 60/2.4 internal diagram. The EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM is capable of shooting up to life-size magnification for stunning detail. It also allows you to achieve much nicer looking bokeh when blurring out your background, whereas a lens with less blades will often produce harsher, more polygonal bokeh. This means that the image produced is a life-size representation of the subject being photographed. What are the differences between Canon and Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 zoom lenses? In my case, that's a non-issue. The EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. The 100mm gives you both more working room and a more natural perspective. A lower weight is also an advantage for home appliances, as it makes transportation easier, and for many other types of products. A very exciting and fun lens to use, opening up a world of hand-holdable macro photography, even to beginners. Based on the images there, it looks like the 35 mm shows a lot more vignetting, but the overall review of the same lens on that site was really positive. If you stop down a bit or shoot real-life subjects, vignetting often disappears. This allows you to fit a small portion of the scene into the photograph, such as when you are zooming in on a subject (based on APS-C format). This means that you can make manual adjustments once the AF has finished, without changing to manual mode. More blades is often an indicator of a better quality lens. I might see if the local camera store will let me test each of these out in store. As for the pricing, I was just looking to see if the lower price on the 35 mm lens was an indication of lower quality. Coordinate-free description of an alternating trilinear form on pure octonions. For Nikon AF-S Micro-NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8G ED lens – minimum focus distance is 18.49cm [Fot.Nikon 60 MFD] In reality, the distance from the front of the lens to the object is half of the minimum focus distance… The practical implication is, that in 1:1 reproduction ratio (maximum magnification) with a 60mm lens you are very close to the teeth. Source: DxOMark. Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. The lens adjusts the optical path accordingly, ensuring that any type of motion blur is corrected before the sensor captures the image. Another advantage is that with a smaller aperture you get a greater depth of field, and can keep all of the image in focus. How does the Canon EF-S 15-85 IS USM compare to the EF 24-105mm L as an all-around lens? But can I assume that both offer the same image quality? Prison planet book where the protagonist is given a quota to commit one murder a week. A macro lens is any lens with 1:1 magnification. It seems the biggest difference between the two is how close I need to be to the subject to get full magnification. For example, a Canon 60mm f/2.8 Macro lens is cheaper to buy than a Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro lens. Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM Fixed Lens for Canon SLR Cameras with 3 Piece Filter Kit, Lens Cleaning Pen, Rubber Air Dust Blower, Hood, Pouch/Sleeve, Cap Keeper (8 Items) $419.99 Get the deal Similar to the number of aperture blades, rounded blades affect the way the light gets through to the sensor.

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Zero Lot Line Homes, What Stereo Fits My Car Best Buy, Whirlpool Ice Maker Model Eckmfez2, Cascade Magnum Yarn Substitute, Oreo Mug Cake In Oven, A Level Sciences, Gavran Matki Usal,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.